These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17446581)

  • 41. Use of opt-out in a trial of chlamydia screening.
    Nathan S; Thacker E; Oakeshott P; Atherton H
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Feb; 19(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 18334078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New technologies enable screening to be carried out in schools and the community.
    Polaneczky M
    BMJ; 1998 Sep; 317(7159):681-2. PubMed ID: 9758503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Chlamydia screening in primary care.
    Oakeshott P; Hay P; Pakianathan M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jul; 54(504):491-3. PubMed ID: 15239908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Snaring a silent threat. Chlamydia declining thanks to screening and prevention.
    Hobus P
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Oct; 10(10):63-6. PubMed ID: 12424886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
    Dekker JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Chlamydia--screening needs in Oklahoma.
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1989 Jan; 82(1):27. PubMed ID: 2926534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Opportunistic chlamydia screening in a general practice consultation.
    Kalwij SA
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5108. PubMed ID: 21844158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Prenatal guidelines and Chlamydia screening].
    Hoyme UB
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1997; 201(4):113-4. PubMed ID: 9410514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Double standards in patient screening?
    Ages D
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Feb; 39():244-5. PubMed ID: 8495111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening in sexually active young women: the processes of change.
    Chacko MR; Von Sternberg K; Velasquez MM
    J Adolesc Health; 2004 May; 34(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 15093798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Screening for chlamydial infection: recommendations and rationale.
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Feb; 65(4):673-6. PubMed ID: 11871685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bad medicine: chlamydia.
    Spence D
    BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2547. PubMed ID: 20462923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Screening for chlamydia among sexually active young people].
    Østergaard LJ; Gutschik E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 11831079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Government to press trusts to meet screening targets for chlamydia.
    White C
    BMJ; 2008 Feb; 336(7639):299. PubMed ID: 18258958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. England's chlamydia screening programme is inefficient and fragmented, MPs say.
    Mooney H
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():c539. PubMed ID: 20110309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Time for action on chlamydia.
    Kalwij SA
    BMJ; 2007 Apr; 334(7598):813. PubMed ID: 17446581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress.
    Fenton KA; Ward H
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 15459397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. With appropriate incentives, general practice can improve the coverage of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Ma R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):892-3. PubMed ID: 17132369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.