361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17447148)
1. Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry data.
Setoguchi S; Solomon DH; Glynn RJ; Cook EF; Levin R; Schneeweiss S
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Jun; 18(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 17447148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of claims-based definitions of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in Medicare patients.
Li Q; Glynn RJ; Dreyer NA; Liu J; Mogun H; Setoguchi S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Jul; 20(7):700-8. PubMed ID: 21608070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records.
Kiyota Y; Schneeweiss S; Glynn RJ; Cannuscio CC; Avorn J; Solomon DH
Am Heart J; 2004 Jul; 148(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15215798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees.
Schenck AP; Klabunde CN; Warren JL; Peacock S; Davis WW; Hawley ST; Pignone M; Ransohoff DF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Oct; 16(10):2118-27. PubMed ID: 17932360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).
Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE): a comparison of claims-based approaches with the Rochester Epidemiology Project VTE cohort.
Leibson CL; Needleman J; Buerhaus P; Heit JA; Melton LJ; Naessens JM; Bailey KR; Petterson TM; Ransom JE; Harris MR
Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 18219240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An examination of Alzheimer's disease case definitions using Medicare claims and survey data.
Lin PJ; Kaufer DI; Maciejewski ML; Ganguly R; Paul JE; Biddle AK
Alzheimers Dement; 2010 Jul; 6(4):334-41. PubMed ID: 20434960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of approaches for estimating incidence costs of care for colorectal cancer patients.
Yabroff KR; Warren JL; Schrag D; Mariotto A; Meekins A; Topor M; Brown ML
Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S56-63. PubMed ID: 19536010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of claims, medical records, and self-report for measuring fecal occult blood testing among medicare enrollees in fee for service.
Schenck AP; Klabunde CN; Warren JL; Peacock S; Davis WW; Hawley ST; Pignone M; Ransohoff DF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 18381471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Medicare claims data in identifying Parkinsonism cases: comparison with the Medicare current beneficiary survey.
Noyes K; Liu H; Holloway R; Dick AW
Mov Disord; 2007 Mar; 22(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 17230477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients.
Klabunde CN; Harlan LC; Warren JL
Med Care; 2006 Oct; 44(10):921-8. PubMed ID: 17001263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linking claims and cancer registry data: is it worth the effort?
Fleming ST; Kohrs FP
Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1998; 6(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 10180128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer incidence using administrative data: correction with sensitivity and specificity.
Couris CM; Polazzi S; Olive F; Remontet L; Bossard N; Gomez F; Schott AM; Mitton N; Colonna M; Trombert B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 19070463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epidemiology and economic burden of brain metastases among patients with primary breast cancer: results from a US claims data analysis.
Pelletier EM; Shim B; Goodman S; Amonkar MM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 17577662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer registry databases: an overview of techniques of statistical analysis and impact on cancer epidemiology.
Das A
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():31-49. PubMed ID: 19109773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data.
Rolnick SJ; Hart G; Barton MB; Herrinton L; Flores SK; Paulsen KJ; Husson G; Harris EL; Geiger AM; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 15124502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
