These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17447324)

  • 1. Ask the doctors. I've read that tissue valve replacement is good for only about 10 years. If true, my time would be up very soon. What can I do to extend the life of my valve and myself?
    Heart Advis; 2007 Mar; 10(3):8. PubMed ID: 17447324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kangaroo xenobioprostheses--an advantage in heart valve replacement.
    Weinhold C; Weingartner J; Adt M; Peters D; Reichart B; Kreuzer E; Gokel JM; Hammer C
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():251-3. PubMed ID: 3727696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mitral stenosis].
    Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Zasłonka J
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 1921113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability of porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    van Heurn LW; English TA
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Feb; 39(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 2011845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?
    Une D; Ruel M; David TE
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 46(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 24510909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability.
    Vesely I
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of pressure- and volume-loss of technical and biological heart valve prostheses.
    Köhler J
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():272-6. PubMed ID: 3727699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
    Schoen FJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Original expectations of the Hancock valve and 20 years of clinical reality.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Mazzucco A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S75-8. PubMed ID: 1389284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Selection of the prosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement].
    Yada I; Mizutani T; Miyamura K; Nasu M; Yuasa H; Kusagawa M; Shomura T; Hata H; Yoshizumi M; Fujii H
    Kyobu Geka; 1984 Sep; 37(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 6503073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test.
    Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten years experience with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft heart valve.
    Ionescu MI; Chidambaram M; Hasan SS; Tandon AP; Smith DR
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Apr; 30(4):488-502. PubMed ID: 7119515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Pre and postoperative hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement by Björk-Shiley (MBP) or swine-(HPX)-valves].
    Fricke G; Papachrysanthou C; Mattern H; Wisskirchen KJ
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1978; (84):772-6. PubMed ID: 742122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR
    Can J Surg; 1985 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 4063890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "ideal" replacement heart valve.
    Sapirstein JS; Smith PK
    Am Heart J; 2001 May; 141(5):856-60. PubMed ID: 11320378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery.
    Popma JJ; Adams DH; Reardon MJ; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Heimansohn D; Hermiller J; Hughes GC; Harrison JK; Coselli J; Diez J; Kafi A; Schreiber T; Gleason TG; Conte J; Buchbinder M; Deeb GM; Carabello B; Serruys PW; Chenoweth S; Oh JK;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 May; 63(19):1972-81. PubMed ID: 24657695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.