133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17447549)
1. Biogeochemical factors affecting mercury methylation in sediments of the Venice Lagoon, Italy.
Han S; Obraztsova A; Pretto P; Choe KY; Gieskes J; Deheyn DD; Tebot BM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2007 Apr; 26(4):655-63. PubMed ID: 17447549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury speciation in marine sediments under sulfate-limited conditions.
Han S; Narasingarao P; Obraztsova A; Gieskes J; Hartmann AC; Tebo BM; Allen EE; Deheyn DD
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3752-7. PubMed ID: 20429556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of organic matter lability for monomethylmercury production in sulfate-rich marine sediments.
Kim M; Han S; Gieskes J; Deheyn DD
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):778-84. PubMed ID: 21109287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mercury methylation and sulfate reduction rates in mangrove sediments, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The role of different microorganism consortia.
Correia RRS; Guimarães JRD
Chemosphere; 2017 Jan; 167():438-443. PubMed ID: 27750167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial mercury transformation in anoxic freshwater sediments under iron-reducing and other electron-accepting conditions.
Warner KA; Roden EE; Bonzongo JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(10):2159-65. PubMed ID: 12785521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of dissolved neutral mercury sulfides for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments.
Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Skyllberg U
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2270-6. PubMed ID: 17438774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercury mobilization and speciation linked to bacterial iron oxide and sulfate reduction: A column study to mimic reactive transfer in an anoxic aquifer.
Hellal J; Guédron S; Huguet L; Schäfer J; Laperche V; Joulian C; Lanceleur L; Burnol A; Ghestem JP; Garrido F; Battaglia-Brunet F
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Sep; 180():56-68. PubMed ID: 26275395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of mercury biogeochemical cycling at the sediment-water interface in anthropogenically modified lagoon environments.
Petranich E; Covelli S; Acquavita A; Faganeli J; Horvat M; Contin M
J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Jun; 68():5-23. PubMed ID: 29908744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California, USA.
Marvin-DiPasquale M; Windham-Myers L; Agee JL; Kakouros E; Kieu le H; Fleck JA; Alpers CN; Stricker CA
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():288-99. PubMed ID: 24188689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments.
Yu RQ; Flanders JR; Mack EE; Turner R; Mirza MB; Barkay T
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2684-91. PubMed ID: 22148328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biogeochemical factors influencing net mercury methylation in contaminated freshwater sediments from the St. Lawrence River in Cornwall, Ontario, Canada.
Avramescu ML; Yumvihoze E; Hintelmann H; Ridal J; Fortin D; Lean DR
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Feb; 409(5):968-78. PubMed ID: 21176945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?
Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Skyllberg U
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 18350890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High methylmercury production under ferruginous conditions in sediments impacted by sewage treatment plant discharges.
Bravo AG; Bouchet S; Guédron S; Amouroux D; Dominik J; Zopfi J
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():245-55. PubMed ID: 26005785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mercury contaminated sediment sites-an evaluation of remedial options.
Randall PM; Chattopadhyay S
Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():131-49. PubMed ID: 23489986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sediments of the Venice Lagoon (Italy) evaluated in a screening risk assessment approach: part I--application of international sediment quality guidelines.
Apitz SE; Barbanti A; Bocci M; Carlin A; Montobbio L; Bernstein AG
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):393-414. PubMed ID: 17695112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of salinity on mercury methylating benthic microbes and their activities in Great Salt Lake, Utah.
Boyd ES; Yu RQ; Barkay T; Hamilton TL; Baxter BK; Naftz DL; Marvin-DiPasquale M
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Mar; 581-582():495-506. PubMed ID: 28057343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atmospheric bulk deposition to the lagoon of Venice Part I. Fluxes of metals, nutrients and organic contaminants.
Rossini P; Guerzoni S; Molinaroli E; Rampazzo G; De Lazzari A; Zancanaro A
Environ Int; 2005 Sep; 31(7):959-74. PubMed ID: 16019069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative relationship that demonstrates mercury methylation rates in marine sediments are based on the community composition and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
King JK; Kostka JE; Frischer ME; Saunders FM; Jahnke RA
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jun; 35(12):2491-6. PubMed ID: 11432553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacts of crab bioturbation and local pollution on sulfate reduction, Hg distribution and methylation in mangrove sediments, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Correia RRS; Guimarães JRD
Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Aug; 109(1):453-460. PubMed ID: 27269386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments.
Hammerschmidt CR; Fitzgerald WF
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1487-95. PubMed ID: 15046351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
