These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17447592)

  • 1. [Bias of results in clinical research due to method of informed consent].
    Appels CW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Mar; 151(12):681-2. PubMed ID: 17447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.
    Junghans C; Feder G; Hemingway H; Timmis A; Jones M
    BMJ; 2005 Oct; 331(7522):940. PubMed ID: 16157604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network.
    Willison DJ; Kapral MK; Peladeau P; Richards JA; Fang J; Silver FL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 May; 7():E6. PubMed ID: 16716233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [No prior informed consent required for 'no-risk' scientific research].
    Vandenbroucke JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):616. PubMed ID: 16610503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bias of results in clinical research due to method of informed consent].
    Roscam Abbing HD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 May; 151(18):1045-6. PubMed ID: 17511106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability in IRBs regarding parental acceptance of passive consent.
    Higgerson RA; Olsho LE; Christie LM; Rehder K; Doksum T; Gedeit R; Giuliano JS; Brennan B; Wendlandt R; Randolph AG;
    Pediatrics; 2014 Aug; 134(2):e496-503. PubMed ID: 25002659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public perception of emergency research: a questionnaire.
    Booth MG; Lind A; Read E; Kinsella J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):933-7. PubMed ID: 16318665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beating the barriers: recruitment of people with intellectual disability to participate in research.
    Lennox N; Taylor M; Rey-Conde T; Bain C; Purdie DM; Boyle F
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2005 Apr; 49(Pt 4):296-305. PubMed ID: 15816817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Viewpoint: IRBs, hospital ethics committees, and the need for "translational informed consent".
    May T; Craig JM; Spellecy R
    Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):670-4. PubMed ID: 17595563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent bias in research: how to avoid it.
    Junghans C; Jones M
    Heart; 2007 Sep; 93(9):1024-5. PubMed ID: 17699171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Time for professionalising the system of medical ethics review in the Netherlands].
    Kenter MJ; Visser HK
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(35):1672-5. PubMed ID: 14513537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
    Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
    J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage.
    Berry JG; Ryan P; Gold MS; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Duszynski KM;
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Oct; 38(10):619-25. PubMed ID: 22518045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing practices in an urban emergency department: assessment of the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV screening in health care settings.
    Haukoos JS; Hopkins E; Byyny RL;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 51(3):303-9, 309.e1. PubMed ID: 18191295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
    Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
    Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; van der Valk P; Sietses C; van den Tol P; van Leeuwen FE
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 19017681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of medical personnel on informed consent for research participation in Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine.
    Suwanpakdee D; Chamnanvanakij S; Panichkul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Nov; 91(11):1754-9. PubMed ID: 19127800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unconditional compensation: reducing the costs of disagreement about compensation for research subjects.
    Sofaer N; Jafarey A; Lei RP; Zhang X; Wikler D
    East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17546900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.