BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17448391)

  • 1. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S82-9. PubMed ID: 17448391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.
    Ashil AM; Sharma A; Jose LK; Grover S; Kochar AS; Varghese ST; Sharma T; Ismail PMS
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S927-S929. PubMed ID: 38595369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-Implant Insertion Using a Guide Manufactured with Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing in an Adolescent Patient Suffering from Tooth Eruption Disturbance.
    Weismann C; Heise K; Aretxabaleta M; Cetindis M; Koos B; Schulz MC
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 38247968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' perception of orthodontic mini implants at different sites: anterior vs posterior maxilla.
    Felicita AS
    Gen Dent; 2024; 72(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 38117643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Mini-Implants Placed Using Fully Digital Planned Insertion Guides: A Cadaver Study.
    Stursa L; Wendl B; Jakse N; Pichelmayer M; Weiland F; Antipova V; Kirnbauer B
    J Clin Med; 2023 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 37959247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CBCT and modern intraoral scanners as tools for developing comprehensive, interdisciplinary treatment plans.
    Frąckiewicz W; Jankowska A; Machoy ME
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38376447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Fabrication of a Customized Surgical Template for a Miniscrew Placement Using a Fully Digitized Process.
    Su L; Luo C; Song H; Wang YP; Ab Rahman N
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58119. PubMed ID: 38738106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of an augmented reality aided system on the placement precision of orthodontic miniscrews: A pilot study.
    Hsu MC; Lin CC; Hsu JT; Yu JH; Huang HL
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 38303815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the computed tomography exam important for planning mini-implant installation?
    Rodrigues ES; Mordente CM; Rodrigues LG; Lima IA; Miranda DA; Zenóbio EG; Manzi FR
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e298-e303. PubMed ID: 37152501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Two Chosen 3D Printing Resins Designed for Orthodontic Use: An In Vitro Study.
    Paradowska-Stolarz A; Wezgowiec J; Mikulewicz M
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 36984116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.
    Aboujaoude R; Kmeid R; Gebrael C; Amm E
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 36058991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.
    Truong VM; Kim S; Kim J; Lee JW; Park YS
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():8720412. PubMed ID: 35958810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of two orthodontic mini-implant templates in the infrazygomatic crest zone: a prospective cohort study.
    Su L; Song H; Huang X
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):252. PubMed ID: 35739518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Mini-Implant Placement Using a Computer-Aided Designed Surgical Guide, with Information of Intraoral Scan and the Use of a Cone-Beam CT.
    Vasoglou G; Stefanidaki I; Apostolopoulos K; Fotakidou E; Vasoglou M
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 35735647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individualized 3D-Printed Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Device for Growth Modification in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.
    Kim M; Li J; Kim S; Kim W; Kim SH; Lee SM; Park YL; Yang S; Kim JW
    J Pers Med; 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34834439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3-D Evaluation of temporary skeletal anchorage sites in the maxilla.
    Zago H; Navarro RL; Laranjeira V; Fernandes TM; Conti AC; Oltramari PV
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e1131-e1139. PubMed ID: 34824700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews.
    Lee Y; Choi SH; Yu HS; Erenebat T; Liu J; Cha JY
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 34181723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.
    Abdelkarim A
    Dent J (Basel); 2019 Sep; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 31480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.
    Coşkun İ; Kaya B
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Jun; 31(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 30112515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review.
    Tadinada A; Marczak A; Yadav S; Mukherjee PM
    Turk J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 29(3):73-79. PubMed ID: 30112478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.