These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17448437)
1. Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: will they ever be a thing of the past? Baxter G; Besnard D; Riley D Appl Ergon; 2007 Jul; 38(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 17448437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Control in the cockpit: crews vs. computers. Ropelewski R Aerosp Am; 1996 Aug; 34(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 11538995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived vs. measured effects of advanced cockpit systems on pilot workload and error: are pilots' beliefs misaligned with reality? Casner SM Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):448-56. PubMed ID: 19028379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distributed representation as a principle for the analysis of cockpit information displays. Zhang J Int J Aviat Psychol; 1997; 7(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 11541073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated cockpits special report, part 1. Aviat Week Space Technol; 1995 Jan; 142(5):52-65. PubMed ID: 11542397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cockpit design and cross-cultural issues underlying failures in crew resource management. Harris D; Li WC Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 May; 79(5):537-8. PubMed ID: 18500053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modern cockpit complexity challenges pilot interfaces. Dornheim MA Aviat Week Space Technol; 1995 Jan; 142(4):60-3. PubMed ID: 11539272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A socio-technical analysis of functional properties in a joint cognitive system: a case study in an aircraft cockpit. Adriaensen A; Patriarca R; Smoker A; Bergström J Ergonomics; 2019 Dec; 62(12):1598-1616. PubMed ID: 31478471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single Pilot Operations in Domestic Commercial Aviation. Vu KL; Lachter J; Battiste V; Strybel TZ Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):755-762. PubMed ID: 30063410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reliability design and analysis of man-machine performance of display and illumination system in cockpit]. Wu W; Jiang G; Liao G; Zhong H; Mu X; Wang Y Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Feb; 11(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 11541272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots? Chute RD; Wiener EL Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(3):211-31. PubMed ID: 11540138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A sociotechnical model of the flight crew task. Cahill J; McDonald N; Losa G Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1337-63. PubMed ID: 25509818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated cockpits special report, part 2. Aviat Week Space Technol; 1995 Feb; 142(6):48-57. PubMed ID: 11542398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia and other cancers in commercial jet cockpit crew: a population-based cohort study. Gundestrup M; Storm HH Lancet; 1999 Dec; 354(9195):2029-31. PubMed ID: 10636367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognition and asynchronous distribution between human and machine building accidents. Martins E; Soares M; Augusto L; Laura L Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3308-12. PubMed ID: 22317220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mortality from cancer and other causes in commercial airline crews: a joint analysis of cohorts from 10 countries. Hammer GP; Auvinen A; De Stavola BL; Grajewski B; Gundestrup M; Haldorsen T; Hammar N; Lagorio S; Linnersjö A; Pinkerton L; Pukkala E; Rafnsson V; dos-Santos-Silva I; Storm HH; Strand TE; Tzonou A; Zeeb H; Blettner M Occup Environ Med; 2014 May; 71(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 24389960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A classification on human factor accident/incident of China civil aviation in recent twelve years. Luo XL Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2004 Oct; 17(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 15926226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flight decks and free flight: where are the system boundaries? Hollnagel E Appl Ergon; 2007 Jul; 38(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 17466254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anthropometric evaluation of cockpit designs. Şenol MB Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):246-56. PubMed ID: 26654833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can a glass cockpit display help (or hinder) performance of novices in simulated flight training? Wright S; O'Hare D Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():292-9. PubMed ID: 25480000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]