These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17448732)

  • 1. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.
    Copay AG; Subach BR; Glassman SD; Polly DW; Schuler TC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 17448732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance.
    Bloom DA; Kaplan DJ; Mojica E; Strauss EJ; Gonzalez-Lomas G; Campbell KA; Alaia MJ; Jazrawi LM
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Feb; 51(2):520-524. PubMed ID: 34854345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Spine Literature.
    Chung AS; Copay AG; Olmscheid N; Campbell D; Walker JB; Chutkan N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jul; 42(14):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 27870805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
    Sedaghat AR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):551-560. PubMed ID: 31159641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement.
    Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Feb; 74(2):206-13; discussion 213-4. PubMed ID: 24220005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Neurological Conditions: Review of Concept and Methods.
    Mishra B; Sudheer P; Agarwal A; Srivastava MVP; Nilima ; Vishnu VY
    Ann Indian Acad Neurol; 2023; 26(4):334-343. PubMed ID: 37970301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SF-36 Scores for Use in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
    Badhiwala JH; Witiw CD; Nassiri F; Akbar MA; Jaja B; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(21):E1260-E1266. PubMed ID: 29652783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Results: Is One Minimum Clinically Important Difference Really Enough?
    McCreary DL; Sandberg BC; Bohn DC; Parikh HR; Cunningham BP
    Hand (N Y); 2020 May; 15(3):360-364. PubMed ID: 30461316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.