210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17448830)
1. Manipulating the mandibular distraction site at different stages of consolidation.
Wei S; Scadeng M; Yamashita DD; Pollack H; Faridi O; Tran B; Shuler C; Yen S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 65(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 17448830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthodontic spring guidance of bilateral mandibular distraction in rabbits.
Yen SL; Shang W; Shuler C; Yamashita DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 11606970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-level laser effect on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Miloro M; Miller JJ; Stoner JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 65(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 17236917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new 2-dimensional method for constructing visualized treatment objectives for distraction osteogenesis of the short mandible.
van Beek H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19837600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
Cho BC; Chung HY; Lee DG; Yang JD; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Lee DS; Kwon IC; Bae EH; Jang KH; Park RW; Kim IS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1753-64. PubMed ID: 16297697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 14980594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis for severe telescopic bite correction: a report of 2 cases.
Azumi Y; Sugawara J; Nagasaka H; Kawamura H
World J Orthod; 2007; 8(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17902327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bending of the distraction site during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit: a model for studying segment control and side effects.
Yen SL; Wei S; Li S; Shuler C; Yamashita DD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 11429740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial.
Schortinghuis J; Bronckers AL; Gravendeel J; Stegenga B; Raghoebar GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):1014-21. PubMed ID: 18757179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction of "vario plates" for retention after mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Schwestka-Polly R; Gripp-Rudolph L; Grohmann U; Merten HA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 11307185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery.
Meyer U; Kleinheinz J; Joos U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):140-9. PubMed ID: 15113571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation.
al Ruhaimi KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 30(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 11420905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical and orthodontic considerations for distraction osteogenesis with ROD appliances.
Dessner S; Razdolsky Y; el-Bialy T
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):111-39. PubMed ID: 11905335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advancement of mandibular symphysis with distraction osteogenesis.
Turk T; Cakmak F; Sumer M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 19201331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: Part 1: Laboratory study.
Luchs JS; Stelnicki EJ; Rowe NM; Naijher NS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 13(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12000874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a rabbit model using a novel experimental design.
Al-Sebaei MO; Gagari E; Papageorge M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):664-72. PubMed ID: 15883942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of calcium sulphate on the rate of osteogenesis in distracted bone.
al Ruhaimi KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 30(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 11420906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
