159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17449839)
1. Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults.
LaPointe LL; Heald GR; Stierwalt JA; Kemker BE; Maurice T
J Atten Disord; 2007 May; 10(4):398-409. PubMed ID: 17449839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective attention deficits in poor readers? Dichotic listening, speeded classification, and auditory and visual central and incidental learning tasks.
Pelham WE
Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1050-61. PubMed ID: 535428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
Mayer AR; Kosson DS
Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
Francis AL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual and auditory temporal processing and early reading development.
Hood M; Conlon E
Dyslexia; 2004 Aug; 10(3):234-52. PubMed ID: 15341200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention, working memory, and grammaticality judgment in typical young adults.
Smith PA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):918-31. PubMed ID: 21106695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential distraction effects in short-term and long-term retention of pictures and words.
Pellegrino JW; Siegel AW; Dhawan M
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 1003127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding language and cognitive deficits in very low birth weight children.
Ortiz-Mantilla S; Choudhury N; Leevers H; Benasich AA
Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 18286580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.
Ackerman PL; Beier ME; Boyle MO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):567-89. PubMed ID: 12500864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.
Hale S
Child Dev; 1990 Jun; 61(3):653-63. PubMed ID: 2364741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
Mulligan NW; Peterson D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
Wong KF; Chen HC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.
Bell R; Buchner A; Mund I
Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 18573011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of an auditory distraction on rapid naming after a mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study.
Barrow IM; Collins JN; Britt LD
J Trauma; 2006 Nov; 61(5):1142-9. PubMed ID: 17099520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
