BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17449839)

  • 21. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Elucidating the effects of ageing on remembering perceptually distorted word pairs.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):186-205. PubMed ID: 20694922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.
    Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selective impairment of auditory selective attention under concurrent cognitive load.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 21928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time and cognitive load in working memory.
    Barrouillet P; Bernardin S; Portrat S; Vergauwe E; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 17470006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reaction time: An alternative method for assessing the effects of multiple sclerosis on information processing speed.
    Reicker LI; Tombaugh TN; Walker L; Freedman MS
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Jun; 22(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 17532182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hierarchical forms processing in adults and children.
    Harrison TB; Stiles J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jun; 103(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 18973909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual deficits in developmental dyslexia: relationships between non-linguistic visual tasks and their contribution to components of reading.
    Jones MW; Branigan HP; Kelly ML
    Dyslexia; 2008 May; 14(2):95-115. PubMed ID: 17874457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
    van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
    Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age differences in recollection: three patterns of enhanced encoding.
    Luo L; Hendriks T; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 17563182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rapid serial processing in patients with multiple sclerosis: the role of peripheral deficits.
    Bodling AM; Denney DR; Lynch SG
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):646-50. PubMed ID: 18577294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control.
    Boot WR; Kramer AF; Simons DJ; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 18929349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach.
    Grimm S; Schröger E; Bendixen A; Bäss P; Roye A; Deouell LY
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):934-47. PubMed ID: 18289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.