These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement. Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique. de Maat GH; Punt IM; van Rhijn LW; Schurink GW; van Ooij A J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 19525788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Patel AA; Brodke DS; Pimenta L; Bono CM; Hilibrand AS; Harrop JS; Riew KD; Youssef JA; Vaccaro AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1276-83. PubMed ID: 18469704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures. Gumbs AA; Hanan S; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Sumpio B Spine J; 2007; 7(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 17482110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Total lumbar disc replacement with SB Charité III prosthesis: Chinese experience with more than two years follow-up]. Lu SB; Wang QY; Hai Y; Su QJ; Kang N; Zhang CS Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 18785528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Stieber JR; Donald GD J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Feb; 19(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16462220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc. Regan JJ; McAfee PC; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Geisler FH; Garcia R; Maxwell JH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Injury to major blood vessels in anterior thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery]. Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Bodlák P; Sebesta P; Kryl J; Vojácek J; Pafko P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Apr; 73(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 16735005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement. Mayer HM; Wiechert K Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S159-65. PubMed ID: 12234444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of lumbar plexus anatomy for removal of total disc replacements through a posterior approach. Bumpass DB; Keller TC; Robinson EP; Marks I; Iwanik M; Arlet V; Shen FH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):E274-8. PubMed ID: 18427306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A minimally invasive transmuscular approach to far-lateral L5-S1 level disc herniations: a prospective study. Kotil K; Akcetin M; Bilge T J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 17414982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]