311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17451582)
1. Electronic templates versus dictation for the completion of Mohs micrographic surgery operative notes.
Cowan DA; Sands MB; Rabizadeh SM; Amos CS; Ford C; Nussbaum R; Stein D; Liegeois NJ
Dermatol Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 17451582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structured electronic operative reporting: comparison with dictation in kidney cancer surgery.
Hoffer DN; Finelli A; Chow R; Liu J; Truong T; Lane K; Punnen S; Knox JJ; Legere L; Kurban G; Gallie B; Jewett MA
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Mar; 81(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 22217801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot study of electronic cardiovascular operative notes: qualitative assessment and challenges in implementation.
Brown ML; Quiñonez LG; Schaff HV
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Feb; 210(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 20113937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structured operative reporting: a randomized trial using dictation templates to improve operative reporting.
Gillman LM; Vergis A; Park J; Minor S; Taylor M
Am J Surg; 2010 Jun; 199(6):846-50. PubMed ID: 20609727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic impact of preoperative curettage before Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma.
Lee DA; Ratner D
Dermatol Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):916-22; discussion 922-3. PubMed ID: 16875474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Errors in the interpretation of Mohs histopathology sections over a 1-year fellowship.
Murphy ME; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
Dermatol Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1637-41. PubMed ID: 19018831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of information obtained by operative note abstraction with that recorded on a standardized data collection form.
Scherer R; Zhu Q; Langenberg P; Feldon S; Kelman S; Dickersin K;
Surgery; 2003 Mar; 133(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 12660647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports.
Laflamme MR; Dexter PR; Graham MF; Hui SL; McDonald CJ
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():425-9. PubMed ID: 16779075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery.
Paradisi A; Abeni D; Rusciani A; Cigna E; Wolter M; Scuderi N; Rusciani L; Kaufmann R; Podda M
Cancer Treat Rev; 2008 Dec; 34(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 18684568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telepathology in Mohs micrographic surgery.
Lambert DR; Peters SB
J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 May; 7(5):471-3. PubMed ID: 18505141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staged excision versus Mohs micrographic surgery for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma.
Walling HW; Scupham RK; Bean AK; Ceilley RI
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 57(4):659-64. PubMed ID: 17870430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?
O'Bichere A; Sellu D
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Sep; 79(5 Suppl):204-8; discussion 209. PubMed ID: 9496162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current progress of immunostains in Mohs micrographic surgery: a review.
Thosani MK; Marghoob A; Chen CS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1621-36. PubMed ID: 19018832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transforming clinical dictation into structured notes in an ambulatory care practice.
Ollendieck M; Chueh H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):668-72. PubMed ID: 15360897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, double-blind comparison of the total dose of 1.0% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine required for effective local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery for skin cancers.
Morganroth PA; Gelfand JM; Jambusaria A; Margolis DJ; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 60(3):444-52. PubMed ID: 19231641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a computerized arthroplasty registry to generate operative reports decreases transcription errors.
Jennings JM; McNabb DC; Meservey AJ; Dennis DA; Kim RH; Miner TM
Int J Med Inform; 2017 May; 101():23-27. PubMed ID: 28347444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of Mohs micrographic surgery: review of the literature.
Tierney EP; Hanke CW
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Oct; 8(10):914-22. PubMed ID: 19852120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care.
Gunningberg L; Fogelberg-Dahm M; Ehrenberg A
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19220607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mohs micrographic surgery: our first 100 patients].
Alonso T; Sánchez P; González A; Ingelmo J; Ruiz I; Delgado S; Rodríguez MA
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2008 May; 99(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 18394403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dangers resulting from inaccurate computer-based operative records.
Knight L; Yardley M; Jones A
Br J Clin Pract; 1991; 45(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 1931541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
