These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Model of Multiple Identity Tracking (MOMIT) 2.0: Resolving the serial vs. parallel controversy in tracking. Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():260-274. PubMed ID: 30384128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task. Busey T; Palmer J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory. Papenmeier F; Huff M; Schwan S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):397-415. PubMed ID: 22090188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory. Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity. Franconeri SL; Jonathan SV; Scimeca JM Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):920-5. PubMed ID: 20534781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracking objects that move where they are headed. Jardine NL; Seiffert AE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2168-79. PubMed ID: 21769535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory. Narasimhan S; Tripathy SP; Barrett BT Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts. De Goede M; Postma A Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients. Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The attention cascade model and attentional blink. Shih SI Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes. Becker MW; Rasmussen IP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1325-38. PubMed ID: 18980397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching. Unsworth N; Engle RW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual and verbal memory for objects and their spatial locations. Pezdek K; Evans GW J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 Jul; 5(4):360-73. PubMed ID: 528916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working memory costs of task switching. Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conceptual information on objects' locations. Borghi AM; Caramelli N; Setti A Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15781302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Close encounters of the distracting kind: identifying the cause of visual tracking errors. Bae GY; Flombaum JI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 22215380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]