These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17452438)
1. Government in medicine. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2195. PubMed ID: 17452438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion. Greene MF N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. Bourne RW South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only? Bazzelle RY Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court and abortion rights. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion. Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey? Paulsen MS Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Legal Challenge of Abortion Stigma-and Government Restrictions on the Practice of Medicine. Fox D Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Mar; 50(2):13-15. PubMed ID: 32311137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]