193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17453456)
21. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.
Hamzavi J; Arnoldner C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 17050311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experimental assessment of polyphonic tones with cochlear implants.
Penninger RT; Limb CJ; Vermeire K; Leman M; Dhooge I
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1267-71. PubMed ID: 23921943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
Otto SR; Shannon RV; Wilkinson EP; Hitselberger WE; McCreery DB; Moore JK; Brackmann DE
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Pijl S
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():224-7. PubMed ID: 7668647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of "phantom electrode" technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 20467321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Implantation of multiple intracochlear electrodes for rehabilitation of total deafness: preliminary report.
Chouard CH; MacLeod P
Laryngoscope; 1976 Nov; 86(11):1743-51. PubMed ID: 979501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].
Lehnhardt E
HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 8376183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: a case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies.
Prentiss S; Staecker H; Wolford B
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 24601768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Claes A; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
Ash KR; Shallop JK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical results for the DIGISONIC multichannel cochlear implant.
Chouard CH; Meyer B; Fugain C; Koca O
Laryngoscope; 1995 May; 105(5 Pt 1):505-9. PubMed ID: 7760667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. FMRI evidence for activation of multiple cortical regions in the primary auditory cortex of deaf subjects users of multichannel cochlear implants.
Seghier ML; Boëx C; Lazeyras F; Sigrist A; Pelizzone M
Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jan; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15238446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.
Tan CT; Martin B; Svirsky MA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):187-199. PubMed ID: 28277210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
