These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17453456)

  • 41. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 17364328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
    Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations.
    Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; Parisi ES; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 8970822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():221-9. PubMed ID: 6596846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21063206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of Electroaudiometry with cochlear implant in children with inner ear anomaly.
    Takanami T; Ito K; Yamasoba T; Kaga K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jan; 73(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 19042035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):11-24. PubMed ID: 17257790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques.
    Berrettini S; Forli F; Passetti S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 17666134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation].
    Schorn K; Seifert J; Stecker M; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
    Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The cochlear implant program: an overview.
    Berliner KI; House WF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):11-4. PubMed ID: 6805390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.