These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17453457)

  • 1. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG; Cao KL; Chen XW; Jin X; Zheng ZY; Zeng FG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Knight MR; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.
    Hamzavi J; Arnoldner C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 17050311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Wagner P; Walger M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 21187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.