1538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17453513)
1. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.
Brismar TB; Dahlstrom N; Edsborg N; Persson A; Smedby O; Albiin N
Acta Radiol; 2009 Sep; 50(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 19701821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver].
Zhang HM; Ouyang H; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16750014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of gadoxetate disodium as a contrast agent for mouse liver imaging: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Kiryu S; Inoue Y; Watanabe M; Izawa K; Shimada M; Tojo A; Yoshikawa K; Ohtomo K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18599243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
Nassenstein K; Breuckmann F; Hunold P; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liver. III: Gadolinium-based hepatobiliary contrast agents (Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg).
Giovagnoni A; Paci E
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1996 Feb; 4(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 8673717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard-dose gadopentate dimeglumine for delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Balci NC; Inan N; Anik Y; Erturk MS; Ural D; Demirci A
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 16777557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparative study between Gd-BOPTA, a biliary excretion contrast medium, and Gd-DTPA in the magnetic resonance imaging of the rat liver].
Patrizio G; Pavone P; Cardone G; Pietroletti R; Passariello R; Tettamanti E; Musu C; Felder E
Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 2359853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Runge VM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):643-50. PubMed ID: 9676461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement.
Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA, a new liver-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent. Kinetic and enhancement patterns in normal and cholestatic rats.
Clément O; Mühler A; Vexler V; Berthezène Y; Brasch RC
Invest Radiol; 1992 Aug; 27(8):612-9. PubMed ID: 1428739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Renal enhancement and excretion of the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA].
Zangos S; Hammerstingl R; Mack MG; Straub R; Engelmann K; Eichler K; Balzer T; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2001 Nov; 173(11):1034-40. PubMed ID: 11704914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of brain metastases at 3.0 T using high-relaxivity contrast agents.
Huang B; Liang CH; Liu HJ; Wang GY; Zhang SX
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 19912078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Knopp MV; Giesel FL; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Radeleff J; Requardt M; Kirchin MA; Hentrich HR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jun; 17(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 12766899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinetics of gadobenate dimeglumine in isolated perfused rat liver: MR imaging evaluation.
Pastor CM; Planchamp C; Pochon S; Lorusso V; Montet X; Mayer J; Terrier F; Vallee JP
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 12944603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with hepatic and renal impairment.
Gschwend S; Ebert W; Schultze-Mosgau M; Breuer J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):556-66. PubMed ID: 21623212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulse repetition time and contrast enhancement: simulation study of Gd-BOPTA and conventional contrast agent at different field strengths.
Yrjänä SK; Vaara T; Karttunen A; Koivukangas J
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 18340251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
