These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17454232)

  • 1. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
    Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.