346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17454232)
1. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
Sun XM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
Wang H; Zhong N
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
Sun XM
Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
