These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17454497)

  • 1. Re: Malomo OO, Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006;26:429-432.
    Armstrong C; Power T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):232. PubMed ID: 17454497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parietal peritoneal closure at caesarean section revisited.
    Kroon N; Reginald PW
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 17454464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
    Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
    Doret M; Gaucherand P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z; Zareian P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
    Owen R; Polson D
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 19280506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postoperative obstruction following caesarean section possibly due to non-closure of the peritoneum.
    Van Der Wal C; Maharajan PA; Nicholls JS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Feb; 28(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 18393036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
    Nather A; Zeisler H; Sam CE; Husslein P; Joura EA
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
    Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
    Weerawetwat W; Buranawanich S; Kanawong M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
    Myers SA; Bennett TL
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
    Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.
    Hamel KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e31-2. PubMed ID: 17466672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In the era of 'non-closure of the peritoneum', how to open it? (Not every simple method is optimal, but every optimal method is simple).
    Stark M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):119. PubMed ID: 19140049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visceral peritoneal closure on scar formation at cesarean delivery.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Farine D; Rahimi S; Cavallotti C; Vergara D; Martignago R; Stark M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 May; 105(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 19232595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relevance of post-cesarean adhesions.
    Al-Asmari N; Tulandi T
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():177-81. PubMed ID: 23292673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section.
    Cheong YC; Premkumar G; Metwally M; Peacock JL; Li TC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 19596507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
    Yiyang Z; Qunxi C; Weiling W
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 16784747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
    van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.