331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17454538)
1. The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
J Sports Sci; 2007 Apr; 25(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 17454538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of step and ramp type protocols on the attainment of peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Drake D; Price MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2004 Nov; 25(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 15532006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry.
Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A
J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of ramp rate on VO2peak and "excess" VO2 during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Amaral I; Doherty M; Price MJ; Jones AM
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Aug; 27(8):610-6. PubMed ID: 16874587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of crank rate on peak oxygen consumption during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Price MJ; Doherty M
J Sports Sci; 2001 Dec; 19(12):955-60. PubMed ID: 11820689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of crank rate on physiological responses and exercise efficiency using a range of submaximal workloads during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 27(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 16541375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of VO2(peak) determination in healthy females during an incremental arm ergometry test.
Leicht AS; Sealey RM; Sinclair WH
Int J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 30(7):509-15. PubMed ID: 19455479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry.
Schrieks IC; Barnes MJ; Hodges LD
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jul; 31(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 21672142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of cadence and power output upon physiological and biomechanical responses to incremental arm-crank ergometry.
Price MJ; Collins L; Smith PM; Goss-Sampson M
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Aug; 32(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 17622283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physiological effects of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate during incremental upper-body exercise.
Weissland T; Pelayo P; Vanvelcenaher J; Marais G; Lavoie JM; Robin H
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1997; 76(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 9367283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of crank rate on the slow component of pulmonary O(2) uptake during heavy arm-crank exercise.
Smith PM; McCrindle E; Doherty M; Price MJ; Jones AM
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Jun; 31(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 16770358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.
Smith PM; Chapman ML; Hazlehurst KE; Goss-Sampson MA
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 17337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptations to endurance training in the healthy elderly: arm cranking versus leg cycling.
Pogliaghi S; Terziotti P; Cevese A; Balestreri F; Schena F
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Aug; 97(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 16799819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of shoulder angle on physiological responses during incremental peak arm crank ergometry.
Leicht AS; Spinks WL
J Sports Sci; 2007 Feb; 25(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 17365531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise.
Price MJ; Campbell IG
Int J Sports Med; 1999 Oct; 20(7):457-63. PubMed ID: 10551341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a kayaking ergometer protocol with an arm crank protocol for evaluating peak oxygen consumption.
Forbes SC; Chilibeck PD
J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Nov; 21(4):1282-5. PubMed ID: 18076236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RPE responses during arm and leg exercises: effect of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate.
Marais G; Dupont L; Garcin M; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Feb; 92(1):253-62. PubMed ID: 11322592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of a 3-min all-out Arm Crank Ergometer Exercise Test.
Flueck JL; Lienert M; Schaufelberger F; Perret C
Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 26038881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.
Neville V; Pain MT; Folland JP
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 May; 106(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 19234715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of one-arm crank ergometry in the prediction of upper body aerobic capacity.
Birkett WA; Edwards DF
Clin Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 12(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 9744667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
