332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17454538)
21. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.
Mossberg K; Willman C; Topor MA; Crook H; Patak S
Spinal Cord; 1999 Aug; 37(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 10455533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differentiated perceived exertion and self-regulated wheelchair exercise.
Paulson TA; Bishop NC; Eston RG; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2269-76. PubMed ID: 23562415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.
Balmer J; Bird S; Davison RC; Doherty M; Smith P
J Sports Sci; 2004 Jul; 22(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 15370497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise.
Goosey-Tolfrey VL; Sindall P
J Sports Sci; 2007 Feb; 25(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 17365532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Oxygen uptake and heart rate relationship in persons with spinal cord injury.
Hooker SP; Greenwood JD; Hatae DT; Husson RP; Matthiesen TL; Waters AR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Oct; 25(10):1115-9. PubMed ID: 8231755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of previous dynamic arm exercise on power output during repeated maximal sprint cycling.
Bogdanis GC; Nevill ME; Lakomy HK
J Sports Sci; 1994 Aug; 12(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 7932946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of a fast ramp rate on peak cardiopulmonary parameters during arm crank ergometry.
Castro RR; Pedrosa S; Chabalgoity F; Sousa EB; Nobrega AC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2010 Nov; 30(6):420-5. PubMed ID: 20718807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of protocol design on the identification of ventilatory thresholds and the attainment of peak physiological responses during synchronous arm crank ergometry in able-bodied participants.
Kouwijzer I; Valize M; Valent LJM; Grandjean Perrenod Comtesse P; van der Woude LHV; de Groot S
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Oct; 119(10):2275-2286. PubMed ID: 31435767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spontaneously chosen crank rate variations in submaximal arm exercise with inexperienced subjects. Effects on cardiorespiratory and efficiency parameters.
Marais G; Dupont L; Maillet M; Weissland T; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Int J Sports Med; 2002 Feb; 23(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11842359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The validity of predicting peak oxygen uptake from a perceptually guided graded exercise test during arm exercise in paraplegic individuals.
Al-Rahamneh HQ; Eston RG
Spinal Cord; 2011 Mar; 49(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 20938452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Physiological responses of elite Laser sailors to 30 minutes of simulated upwind sailing.
Cunningham P; Hale T
J Sports Sci; 2007 Aug; 25(10):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17613734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion during arm exercise in able-bodied and persons with poliomyelitis.
Al-Rahamneh HQ; Faulkner JA; Byrne C; Eston RG
Spinal Cord; 2011 Jan; 49(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20514056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of crank length and crank-axle height on standing arm-crank (grinding) power.
Neville V; Pain MT; Kantor J; Folland JP
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 19927020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The placebo and nocebo effects on peak minute power during incremental arm crank ergometry.
Bottoms L; Buscombe R; Nicholettos A
Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 23889363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry.
Hill M; Talbot C; Puddiford M; Price M
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 May; 118(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29511919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway.
Hill MW; Goss-Sampson M; Duncan MJ; Price MJ
Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(8):782-90. PubMed ID: 24707964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise.
Price MJ; Campbell IG
Ergonomics; 1997 Apr; 40(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 9140208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Arm crank ergometer is reliable and valid for measuring aerobic capacity during submaximal exercise.
Bulthuis Y; Drossaers-Bakker W; Oosterveld F; van der Palen J; van de Laar M
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2809-15. PubMed ID: 20885199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants.
Baumgart JK; Gürtler L; Ettema G; Sandbakk Ø
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Sep; 118(9):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 29936549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry.
Tropp H; Samuelsson K; Jorfeldt L
Br J Sports Med; 1997 Mar; 31(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9132210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
