These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455052)

  • 1. "They" as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: eye tracking reveals a processing cost.
    Sanford AJ; Filik R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 17455052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. They're digging up the road again: the processing cost of institutional they.
    Sanford AJ; Filik R; Emmott C; Morrow L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 17943646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing pronouns without antecedents: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Filik R; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18284347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases.
    Albrecht JE; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):599-610. PubMed ID: 9610128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is cataphoric reference recognised?
    Filik R; Sanford AJ
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1112-21. PubMed ID: 18067884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora.
    Kazanina N; Phillips C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):371-400. PubMed ID: 19585389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How gender-expectancy affects the processing of "them".
    Doherty A; Conklin K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):718-735. PubMed ID: 26886400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: evidence for delay.
    Stewart AJ; Holler J; Kidd E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1680-96. PubMed ID: 17853228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors? An ERP study.
    Heine A; Tamm S; Hofmann M; Hutzler F; Jacobs AM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 400(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 16503377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts.
    Järvikivi J; van Gompel RP; Hyönä J; Bertram R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 15828971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Simovic TV; Chambers CG
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13251. PubMed ID: 36745513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehending pronouns: a role for word-specific gender stereotype information.
    Kennison SM; Trofe JL
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 May; 32(3):355-78. PubMed ID: 12845944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):991-1004. PubMed ID: 8962544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns.
    Noll J; Lowry M; Bryant J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1057-1068. PubMed ID: 29549477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process.
    Rigalleau F; Caplan D; Baudiffier V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):893-933. PubMed ID: 15204122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular nouns: implications for theories of sentence processing.
    Kennison SM
    Cognition; 2005 Oct; 97(3):269-94. PubMed ID: 16260262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 16956594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time-course of morphological constraints: evidence from eye-movements during reading.
    Cunnings I; Clahsen H
    Cognition; 2007 Sep; 104(3):476-94. PubMed ID: 16934793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
    Johnson RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are New Gender-Neutral Pronouns Difficult to Process in Reading? The Case of
    Vergoossen HP; Pärnamets P; Renström EA; Gustafsson Sendén M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():574356. PubMed ID: 33244303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.