These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455054)

  • 1. A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search.
    Takeda Y; Phillips S; Kumada T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 17455054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An inter-item similarity model unifying feature and conjunction search.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y; Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3867-80. PubMed ID: 16920177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frontal-parietal synchrony in elderly EEG for visual search.
    Phillips S; Takeda Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19903501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does training under consistent mapping conditions lead to automatic attention attraction to targets in search tasks?
    Lefebvre C; Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1401-15. PubMed ID: 19064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?
    Raymond JE; Fenske MJ; Westoby N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 16366798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology.
    Olivers CN; Hickey C
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1362-71. PubMed ID: 19962396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks.
    Donner TH; Kettermann A; Diesch E; Ostendorf F; Villringer A; Brandt SA
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 11771970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.
    Nakayama K; Silverman GH
    Nature; 1986 Mar 20-26; 320(6059):264-5. PubMed ID: 3960106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search.
    Bacon WJ; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):948-61. PubMed ID: 9269723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.