355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455218)
1. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3-D computerized tomography colonography versus optical colonoscopy for imaging symptomatic gastroenterology patients.
Gomes M; Aldridge RW; Wylie P; Bell J; Epstein O
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 23512599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Hess-Migliorretti A; Riou F; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19574924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Romagnuolo J
Cancer; 2008 Jan; 112(1):222. PubMed ID: 17948908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
Hanly P; Skally M; Fenlon H; Sharp L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 23006522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.
Palimaka S; Blackhouse G; Goeree R
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(15):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials).
Halligan S; Dadswell E; Wooldrage K; Wardle J; von Wagner C; Lilford R; Yao GL; Zhu S; Atkin W
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jul; 19(54):1-134. PubMed ID: 26198205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.
Kuntz KM; Popp J; Beck JR; Zauber AG; Weinberg DS
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32933928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
