These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1745522)

  • 1. Digitally subtracted linear tomograms: three techniques for measuring condylar displacement.
    Ludlow JB; Soltmann R; Tyndall D; Grady JJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):614-20. PubMed ID: 1745522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of quantification of mandibular condyle displacement in digitally subtracted linear tomograms.
    Ludlow JB; Soltmann R; Tyndall D; Grady JJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 1397462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images.
    Ludlow J; Gilbert DB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9082008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of condylar position changes: a test of validity of posteroanterior cephalometric and 20-degree lateral cephalometric techniques enhanced by digital subtraction.
    Gilbert DB; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L; Phillips C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7751763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
    Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for quantifying positional change of the condyle on lateral tomograms by means of digital subtraction.
    Sato H; Ohki M; Kitamori H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 9687118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction temporomandibular joint tomography.
    Prapanpoch S; Langlais RP; Dove SB; Prihoda TJ; McDavid WD; Nummikoski PV; Preece JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jan; 75(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 8419866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of four different methods of evaluation on axially corrected tomograms of the condyle/fossa relationship.
    Karpac JR; Pandis N; Williams B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Sep; 68(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 1432776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observer performance in assessment of condylar position in temporomandibular joint radiograms.
    Liedberg J; Rohlin M; Westesson PL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1985 Mar; 43(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3859985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study.
    Knoernschild KL; Aquilino SA; Ruprecht A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 1774686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of zonography, multidirectional tomography, and biplanar panoramic images for detection of simulated condylar arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint.
    Tyndall DA; Davies KL; Ludlow JB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 9082017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
    Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle.
    Ekberg EC; Petersson A; Nilner M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9780901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing condylar changes with digital subtraction radiography.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA; Zullo TG; Bagnell CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Feb; 75(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8426725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of temporomandibular joint space measurements using corrected hypocycloidal tomography.
    Heffez L; Jordan S; Rosenberg H; Miescke K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Feb; 45(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 3468215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the condyle/fossa relationship before and after prosthetic rehabilitation with maxillary complete denture and mandibular removable partial denture.
    Amorim VC; Laganá DC; de Paula Eduardo JV; Zanetti AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 12806330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms.
    Pullinger A; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Sep; 60(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 3862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporomandibular joint imaging: a comparative study of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bone change with biplanar multidirectional tomography and panoramic images.
    Ludlow JB; Davies KL; Tyndall DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Dec; 80(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 8680983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Athanasiou AE; Mavreas D
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 1811029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.