1338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455444)
1. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments.
Oruc S; Eraslan O; Tukay HA; Atay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18319089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional stress analysis of tooth/lmplant-retained long-span fixed dentures.
Maezawa N; Shiota M; Kasugai S; Wakabayashi N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):710-8. PubMed ID: 17974104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
Lin CL; Wang JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of thickness and area of reline on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone during the healing period: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e231-6. PubMed ID: 22782057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately loaded implants supporting maxillary overdentures.
Akça K; Akkocaoğlu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 16307579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
