These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455752)
1. Changing viewpoints during dynamic events. Garsoffky B; Huff M; Schwan S Perception; 2007; 36(3):366-74. PubMed ID: 17455752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Hesse FW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 12450330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scene recognition following locomotion around a scene. Motes MA; Finlay CA; Kozhevnikov M Perception; 2006; 35(11):1507-20. PubMed ID: 17286121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changing scenes: memory for naturalistic events following change blindness. Mäntylä T; Sundström A Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):696-706. PubMed ID: 15724358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic visual information facilitates object recognition from novel viewpoints. Teramoto W; Riecke BE J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):11. PubMed ID: 21075836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes. Woods AT; Newell FN J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):147-59. PubMed ID: 15477029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation of viewpoint effects in object recognition by shape and motion cues. Vuong QC; Friedman A; Plante C Perception; 2009; 38(11):1628-48. PubMed ID: 20120262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How different types of scenes affect the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and the Perceptual Upright (PU). Haji-Khamneh B; Harris LR Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20553740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coincident orientation of objects and viewpoint-dependence in scene recognition. Li J; Zhang K Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Feb; 114(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 22582697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: mental rotation versus invariant features. Vanrie J; Willems B; Wagemans J Perception; 2001; 30(9):1047-56. PubMed ID: 11694082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrinsic frames of reference and egocentric viewpoints in scene recognition. Mou W; Fan Y; McNamara TP; Owen CB Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):750-69. PubMed ID: 17540353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognizing dynamic scenes: influence of processing orientation. Huff M; Schwan S; Garsoffky B Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Apr; 112(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21667754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(8):779-95. PubMed ID: 20144645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints. Gomez P; Shutter J; Rouder JN Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 18926985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]