These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455757)

  • 1. How to keep a reversible figure from reversing: teasing out top-down and bottom-up processes.
    Long GM; Moran CJ
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 17455757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes in the perception of ambiguous figures.
    Intaitė M; Noreika V; Šoliūnas A; Falter CM
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():24-31. PubMed ID: 23851264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?
    Long GM; Olszweski AD
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):41-71. PubMed ID: 10696278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new twist on the rotating-trapezoid illusion: evidence for neural-adaptation effects.
    Long GM; Toppino TC
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 7845756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prime time: fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures.
    Long GM; Toppino TC; Mondin GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Dec; 52(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 1287566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissecting perceptual processes with a new tri-stable reversible figure.
    Long GM; Batterman JM
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1163-85. PubMed ID: 23469699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time for a change: what dominance durations reveal about adaptation effects in the perception of a bi-stable reversible figure.
    Toppino TC; Long GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):867-82. PubMed ID: 25522830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual-binding in a rotating Necker cube: The effect of context motion and position.
    Ouhnana M; Kingdom FAA
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():59-68. PubMed ID: 26975500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A different view on the Necker cube-Differences in multistable perception dynamics between Asperger and non-Asperger observers.
    Kornmeier J; Wörner R; Riedel A; Tebartz van Elst L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189197. PubMed ID: 29244813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reversible-figure perception: Why is voluntary control limited?
    Toppino TC
    Perception; 2022 Sep; 51(9):624-638. PubMed ID: 35833335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common contextual influences in ambiguous and rivalrous figures.
    Ouhnana M; Jennings BJ; Kingdom FAA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176842. PubMed ID: 28459854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reversing how to think about ambiguous figure reversals: spontaneous alternating by uninformed observers.
    Mitroff SR; Sobel DM; Gopnik A
    Perception; 2006; 35(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 16836059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal dynamics of different cases of bi-stable figure-ground perception.
    Kogo N; Hermans L; Stuer D; van Ee R; Wagemans J
    Vision Res; 2015 Jan; 106():7-19. PubMed ID: 25451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Necker cube--an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing.
    Kornmeier J; Bach M
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):955-60. PubMed ID: 15695180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of pattern shape, subliminal stimulation, and voluntary control on multistable visual perception.
    Taddei-Ferretti C; Radilova J; Musio C; Santillo S; Cibelli E; Cotugno A; Radil T
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():163-70. PubMed ID: 18617160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid perceptual switching of a reversible biological figure.
    Jackson S; Cummins F; Brady N
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3982. PubMed ID: 19093003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion.
    Nawrot M; Blake R
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 2011461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambiguous figures: living versus nonliving objects.
    Verstijnen IM; Wagemans J
    Perception; 2004; 33(5):531-46. PubMed ID: 15250659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures.
    Strüber D; Stadler M
    Perception; 1999; 28(10):1185-96. PubMed ID: 10694967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new cue to figure-ground coding: top-bottom polarity.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2004 Nov; 44(24):2779-91. PubMed ID: 15342222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.