These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455758)

  • 1. The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task.
    Edmonds AJ; Lewis MB
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):446-60. PubMed ID: 17455758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A sideways look at configural encoding: two different effects of face rotation.
    Lewis MB; Glenister TE
    Perception; 2003; 32(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 12613782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of the processing capacity of features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Donnelly N; Cornes K; Menneer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1475-87. PubMed ID: 22707354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Thatcher illusion: rotating the viewer instead of the picture.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 17564200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faces as objects of non-expertise: processing of thatcherised faces in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Carbon CC; Grüter T; Weber JE; Lueschow A
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1635-45. PubMed ID: 18265844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Perception; 2006; 35(11):1473-83. PubMed ID: 17286118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The lady's not for turning: rotation of the Thatcher illusion.
    Lewis MB
    Perception; 2001; 30(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 11464565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural information in gender categorisation.
    Baudouin JY; Humphreys GW
    Perception; 2006; 35(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 16700294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of configurality in the Thatcher illusion: an ERP study.
    Mestry N; Menneer T; Wenger MJ; Benikos N; McCarthy RA; Donnelly N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 25102929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Fischer MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16082532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion.
    Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25301017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thatcher's children: development and the Thatcher illusion.
    Lewis MB
    Perception; 2003; 32(12):1415-21. PubMed ID: 14992420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.
    McKone E
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):268-83. PubMed ID: 19022276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making heads turn: the effect of familiarity and stimulus rotation on a gender-classification task.
    Stevenage SV; Osborne CD
    Perception; 2006; 35(11):1485-94. PubMed ID: 17286119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.