These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455758)

  • 41. Is the Thatcher Illusion Modulated by Face Familiarity? Evidence from an Eye Tracking Study.
    Utz S; Carbon CC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163933. PubMed ID: 27776145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effects of face inversion and contrast-reversal on efficiency and internal noise.
    Gaspar CM; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(8):1084-95. PubMed ID: 18314157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Wenger MJ; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 18315409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What makes faces special?
    Yue X; Tjan BS; Biederman I
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3802-11. PubMed ID: 16938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does Thompson's Thatcher Effect reflect a face-specific mechanism?
    Wong YK; Twedt E; Sheinberg D; Gauthier I
    Perception; 2010; 39(8):1125-41. PubMed ID: 20942363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 18256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption.
    Lewis MB; Johnston RA
    Perception; 1997; 26(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 9274755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.
    Searcy JH; Bartlett JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 8756958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing.
    McKone E; Martini P; Nakayama K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):573-99. PubMed ID: 11424647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: an event-related brain potential study.
    Caharel S; Montalan B; Fromager E; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Mohamed R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 21055428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Discriminating Thatcherised from typical faces in a case of prosopagnosia.
    Mestry N; Donnelly N; Menneer T; McCarthy RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3410-8. PubMed ID: 23010063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differential sensitivity to rotations of facial features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Riby DM; Riby LM; Reay JL
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):721-6. PubMed ID: 20099533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.
    Freire A; Lee K; Symons LA
    Perception; 2000; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10820599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with geometrical discrimination.
    Pallett PM; MacLeod DI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):504-20. PubMed ID: 21264731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inversion improves the recognition of facial expression in thatcherized images.
    Psalta L; Andrews TJ
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):715-30. PubMed ID: 25549504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception.
    Sergent J
    Br J Psychol; 1984 May; 75 ( Pt 2)():221-42. PubMed ID: 6733396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.