145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17455827)
1. A 60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser creates a smoother LASIK stromal bed surface compared to a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome in human donor eyes.
Sarayba MA; Ignacio TS; Tran DB; Binder PS
J Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 23(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17455827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes.
Sarayba MA; Ignacio TS; Binder PS; Tran DB
Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 17457194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of stromal bed of LASIK flaps created with femtosecond lasers (IntraLase FS150, WaveLight FS200) and mechanical microkeratome.
Kymionis GD; Kontadakis GA; Naoumidi I; Kankariya VP; Panagopoulou S; Manousaki A; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 98(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 24187054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the femtosecond laser (IntraLase) versus manual microkeratome (Moria ALTK) in dissection of the donor in endothelial keratoplasty: initial study in eye bank eyes.
Jones YJ; Goins KM; Sutphin JE; Mullins R; Skeie JM
Cornea; 2008 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 18245973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser.
Tan CS; Au Eong KG; Lee HM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 17098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scanning Electronic Microscopy Evaluation of the Roughness of the Stromal Bed After Deep Corneal Cut with the LDV Femtosecond Laser (Z6) (Ziemer) and the ONE Microkeratome (Moria).
Varga Z; Bergin C; Roy S; Nicolas M; Tschuor P; Majo F
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Oct; 41(10):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 26881295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative micromorphologic in vitro porcine study of IntraLase and Femto LDV femtosecond lasers.
Kermani O; Oberheide U
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1393-9. PubMed ID: 18655994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of corneal stromal roughness after iFS 150 kHz and LenSx femtosecond LASIK flap creation in porcine eyes.
Gros-Otero J; Ketabi S; Cañones-Zafra R; Garcia-Gonzalez M; Parafita-Fernandez A; Villa-Collar C; Casado S; Teus M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2665-2670. PubMed ID: 31650272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60.
Mootha VV; Heck E; Verity SM; Petroll WM; Lakshman N; Muftuoglu O; Bowman RW; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD
Cornea; 2011 Mar; 30(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 21304290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of LASIK flap thickness and morphology between the Intralase 60- and 150-kHz femtosecond lasers.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Refract Surg; 2014 Dec; 30(12):827-30. PubMed ID: 25437481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.
Salomão MQ; Ambrósio R; Wilson SE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1756-60. PubMed ID: 19781472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of submicrojoule femtosecond laser corneal tissue dissection.
Binder PS; Sarayba M; Ignacio T; Juhasz T; Kurtz R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 18165095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications of LASIK flaps made by the IntraLase 15- and 30-kHz femtosecond lasers.
Haft P; Yoo SH; Kymionis GD; Ide T; O'Brien TP; Culbertson WW
J Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 25(11):979-84. PubMed ID: 19921765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal stromal roughness after VisuMax and Intralase femtosecond laser photodisruption: An atomic force microscopy study.
Gros-Otero J; Ketabi S; Cañones-Zafra R; Garcia-Gonzalez M; Villa-Collar C; Casado S; Teus MA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252449. PubMed ID: 34043738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes.
Vetter JM; Faust M; Gericke A; Pfeiffer N; Weingärtner WE; Sekundo W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2011-8. PubMed ID: 23079315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
