162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17456877)
21. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automatic colon polyp flagging via geometric and texture features.
Fiori M; Musé P; Aguirre S; Sapiro G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3170-3. PubMed ID: 21096596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Registration of prone and supine CT colonography scans based on correlation optimized warping and canonical correlation analysis.
Wang S; Yao J; Liu J; Petrick N; Summers RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():81-4. PubMed ID: 19964919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Symmetric curvature patterns for colonic polyp detection.
Jerebko A; Lakare S; Cathier P; Periaswamy S; Bogoni L
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):169-76. PubMed ID: 17354769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intra-patient supine-prone colon registration in CT colonography using shape spectrum.
Lai Z; Hu J; Liu C; Taimour V; Pai D; Zhu J; Xu J; Hua J
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 1):332-9. PubMed ID: 20879248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve.
O'Connor SD; Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 17005773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perceptive errors in CT colonography.
Nio CY; de Vries AH; Stoker J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):556-70. PubMed ID: 17160495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CT colonography: clinical evaluation of a method for automatic coregistration of polyps at follow-up surveillance studies.
Helbren E; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ; Halligan S
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 24991991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT colonography: external clinical validation of an algorithm for computer-assisted prone and supine registration.
Boone DJ; Halligan S; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Helbren E; Slabaugh GG; McQuillan J; McClelland JR; Hu M; Punwani S; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):752-60. PubMed ID: 23687175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fully automated colon segmentation for the computation of complete colon centerline in virtual colonoscopy.
Lu L; Zhang D; Li L; Zhao J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):996-1004. PubMed ID: 22207637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography.
Göktürk SB; Tomasi C; Acar B; Beaulieu CF; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Napel S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1251-60. PubMed ID: 11811825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. From point to local neighborhood: polyp detection in CT colonography using geodesic ring neighborhoods.
Ong JL; Seghouane AK
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Apr; 20(4):1000-10. PubMed ID: 20840898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
