798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17457187)
1. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome.
Küçükerdönmez C; Akova YA; Altinörs DD
Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 17457187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative conjunctival inflammation after pterygium surgery with amniotic membrane transplantation versus conjunctival autograft.
Kheirkhah A; Nazari R; Nikdel M; Ghassemi H; Hashemi H; Behrouz MJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 152(5):733-8. PubMed ID: 21742306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of bare sclera, limbal-conjunctival autograft and amniotic membrane graft techniques in primary pterygium excisions.
Ozer A; Yildirim N; Erol N; Yurdakul S
Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 19339811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three methods for the treatment of pterygium: amniotic membrane graft, conjunctival autograft and conjunctival autograft plus mitomycin C.
Katircioğlu YA; Altiparmak UE; Duman S
Orbit; 2007 Mar; 26(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17510864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transplantation of conjunctival limbal autograft and amniotic membrane vs mitomycin C and amniotic membrane in treatment of recurrent pterygium.
Fallah MR; Golabdar MR; Amozadeh J; Zare MA; Moghimi S; Fakhraee G
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 17159974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized trial of pterygium surgery with mitomycin C application using conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival-limbal autograft.
Kheirkhah A; Hashemi H; Adelpour M; Nikdel M; Rajabi MB; Behrouz MJ
Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 22153864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of recurrent pterygium surgery: limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus mitomycin C with conjunctival flap.
Mutlu FM; Sobaci G; Tatar T; Yildirim E
Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):817-21. PubMed ID: 10201608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of pterygium surgery: analysis over 14 years.
Fernandes M; Sangwan VS; Bansal AK; Gangopadhyay N; Sridhar MS; Garg P; Aasuri MK; Nutheti R; Rao GN
Eye (Lond); 2005 Nov; 19(11):1182-90. PubMed ID: 15543190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of tissue glue and vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision.
Ozdamar Y; Mutevelli S; Han U; Ileri D; Onal B; Ilhan O; Karakaya J; Zilelioglu O
Cornea; 2008 Jun; 27(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 18520504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of de-epithelialized amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival autograft after primary pterygium excision.
Memarzadeh F; Fahd AK; Shamie N; Chuck RS
Eye (Lond); 2008 Jan; 22(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 16763656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of mitomycin C with conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery in Asian-Canadians.
Wong VA; Law FC
Ophthalmology; 1999 Aug; 106(8):1512-5. PubMed ID: 10442896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision.
Luanratanakorn P; Ratanapakorn T; Suwan-Apichon O; Chuck RS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 90(12):1476-80. PubMed ID: 16837545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conjunctival rotation autograft for pterygium. An alternative to conjunctival autografting.
Jap A; Chan C; Lim L; Tan DT
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jan; 106(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 9917783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vascularization is more delayed in amniotic membrane graft than conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision.
Küçükerdönmez C; Akova YA; Altinörs DD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):245-249. PubMed ID: 17173849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autologous cultivated conjunctival transplantation for pterygium surgery.
Ang LP; Tan DT; Cajucom-Uy H; Beuerman RW
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 139(4):611-9. PubMed ID: 15808155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of mini-flap technique and conjunctival autograft transplantation without mitomycin C in primary and recurrent pterygium.
Kim M; Chung SH; Lee JH; Lee HK; Seo KY
Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 18536527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conjunctival autograft for pterygium surgery: how well does it prevent recurrence?
Figueiredo RS; Cohen EJ; Gomes JA; Rapuano CJ; Laibson PR
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1997 Feb; 28(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 9054479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-dose intraoperative mitomycin-C versus conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery: long term follow-up.
Sharma A; Gupta A; Ram J; Gupta A
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2000; 31(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 10928667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inferior conjunctival autograft for primary pterygia.
Syam PP; Eleftheriadis H; Liu CS
Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):806-10. PubMed ID: 12689907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pterygium surgery: conjunctival rotation autograft versus conjunctival autograft.
Dadeya S; Malik KP; Gullian BP
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2002; 33(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 12134984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]