264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17457194)
21. Quality assessment model of 3 different microkeratomes through confocal microscopy.
Javaloy Estañ J; Vidal MT; Quinto A; De Rojas V; Alió JL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 15177608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [In-vitro comparison of morphology of current microkeratomes for LASIK].
Schäfer S; Spallek R; Russ D; Pohl T; Lang GK; Kampmeier J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Aug; 222(8):615-22. PubMed ID: 16118741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal flap cuts: morphology, accuracy, and histopathology.
Holzer MP; Rabsilber TM; Auffarth GU
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2828-31. PubMed ID: 16799021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome.
Kim JY; Kim MJ; Kim TI; Choi HJ; Pak JH; Tchah H
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):599-604. PubMed ID: 16431956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser.
Tan CS; Au Eong KG; Lee HM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 17098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Scanning Electronic Microscopy Evaluation of the Roughness of the Stromal Bed After Deep Corneal Cut with the LDV Femtosecond Laser (Z6) (Ziemer) and the ONE Microkeratome (Moria).
Varga Z; Bergin C; Roy S; Nicolas M; Tschuor P; Majo F
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Oct; 41(10):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 26881295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings.
Tehrani M; Schäfer S; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2415-9. PubMed ID: 15519098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome.
Muallem MS; Yoo SY; Romano AC; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1902-8. PubMed ID: 15342053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser.
Binder PS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jan; 30(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 14967265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the flaps made by femtosecond laser and automated keratomes for sub-bowman keratomileusis.
Zhai CB; Tian L; Zhou YH; Zhang QW; Zhang J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Jul; 126(13):2440-4. PubMed ID: 23823815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary eyes and fellow eyes using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome.
Ho T; Cheng AC; Lau S; Lam DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2049-53. PubMed ID: 18053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurement of the LASIK flap thickness profile using the IntraLase femtosecond laser and M2 and Carriazo-Pendular microkeratomes.
Alió JL; Piñero DP
J Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 18269144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Femtosecond laser LASIK flap preparation with conical incision and positional spikes.
Jonas JB; Vossmerbaeumer U
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1107-8. PubMed ID: 15130651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser.
Hernández-Verdejo JL; Teus MA; Román JM; Bolívar G
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 17197518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the femtosecond laser (IntraLase) versus manual microkeratome (Moria ALTK) in dissection of the donor in endothelial keratoplasty: initial study in eye bank eyes.
Jones YJ; Goins KM; Sutphin JE; Mullins R; Skeie JM
Cornea; 2008 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 18245973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Temporal hinge laser in situ keratomileusis: maximizing treatable stromal bed area.
Assil KK; McCall T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 16039487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intraocular pressure measurements during flap preparation using 2 femtosecond lasers and 1 microkeratome in human donor eyes.
Vetter JM; Faust M; Gericke A; Pfeiffer N; Weingärtner WE; Sekundo W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2011-8. PubMed ID: 23079315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative study of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60.
Mootha VV; Heck E; Verity SM; Petroll WM; Lakshman N; Muftuoglu O; Bowman RW; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD
Cornea; 2011 Mar; 30(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 21304290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surface quality of femtosecond dissected posterior human corneal stroma investigated with atomic force microscopy.
Lombardo M; De Santo MP; Lombardo G; Schiano Lomoriello D; Desiderio G; Ducoli P; Barberi R; Serrao S
Cornea; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1369-75. PubMed ID: 22262224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
