BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17457595)

  • 1. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem.
    Malhotra R; Dua A; Kiran EK; Bhan S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Hydroxyapatite-coated stems in total hip arthroplasty after a minimum 10-years follow-up.
    Gallo J; Landor I; Cechová I; Jahoda D
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Oct; 75(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19026187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e17-22. PubMed ID: 19070709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Omnifit-HA stem in total hip arthroplasty. A 2- to 5-year followup.
    D'Lima DD; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jun; (363):163-9. PubMed ID: 10379318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures.
    Mertl P; Philippot R; Rosset P; Migaud H; Tabutin J; Van de Velde D
    Int Orthop; 2011 Feb; 35(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 21184221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a cementless modular stem in the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in conjunction with ipsilateral coxarthrosis.
    Oztürkmen Y; Uzümcügil O; Sükür E; Karamehmetoğlu M; Caniklioğlu M
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):13. PubMed ID: 21210621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components.
    Engh CA; Culpepper WJ; Kassapidis E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):168-78. PubMed ID: 9520886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using proximal porous-coated femoral implants.
    Brindley GW; Adams R
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1998; 7(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 9876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components: 15-year minimum followup.
    Capello WN; D'Antonio JA; Jaffe WL; Geesink RG; Manley MT; Feinberg JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():75-80. PubMed ID: 17016216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
    Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Results of the Evora dual mobility socket: five years follow-up].
    Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Feb; 94(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18342028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Revision hip arthroplasty with the cementless prosthesis: 4 years follow-up study].
    Kou BL; Lin JH; Guan ZP; Sun TZ; Wei W; Li H; Lü HS
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 43(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 15938905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.