273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17457598)
1. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Hente R; Maghsudi M; Völk M; Hammer J; Nerlich M; Prantl L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 17457598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intramedullary stabilization of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary implants including a new proximal tibia nail (PTN).
Hansen M; Mehler D; Hessmann MH; Blum J; Rommens PM
J Orthop Trauma; 2007; 21(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 17986887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens.
Lill H; Hepp P; Korner J; Kassi JP; Verheyden AP; Josten C; Duda GN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):74-81. PubMed ID: 12721684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.
Foruria AM; Carrascal MT; Revilla C; Munuera L; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20153916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.
Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-part proximal humerus fractures: a cadaveric study.
Gillespie RJ; Ramachandran V; Lea ES; Vallier HA
Orthopedics; 2009 Nov; 32(11):816. PubMed ID: 19902894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.
Seide K; Triebe J; Faschingbauer M; Schulz AP; Püschel K; Mehrtens G; Jürgens Ch
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17134800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Angle-fixed plate fixation or double-plate osteosynthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study].
Hessmann MH; Korner J; Hofmann A; Sternstein W; Rommens PM
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 18601621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal fixation of dorsally comminuted fractures of the distal part of the radius: a biomechanical analysis of volar plate and intramedullary nail fracture stability.
Konstantinidis L; Helwig P; Seifert J; Hirschmüller A; Liodakis E; Südkamp NP; Oberst M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Nov; 131(11):1529-37. PubMed ID: 21744234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive update on current fixation options for two-part proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical investigation.
Yoon RS; Dziadosz D; Porter DA; Frank MA; Smith WR; Liporace FA
Injury; 2014 Mar; 45(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 24168862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximal humeral fractures: what is semi-rigid? Biomechanical properties of semi-rigid implants, a biomechanical cadaver based evaluation.
Kralinger F; Gschwentner M; Wambacher M; Smekal V; Haid C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Feb; 128(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18040704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates.
Strauss EJ; Alfonso D; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Tejwani NC
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Mar; 21(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 17473753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model.
Rothstock S; Plecko M; Kloub M; Schiuma D; Windolf M; Gueorguiev B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):686-91. PubMed ID: 22465242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biomechanical studies of 9 tibial interlocking nails in a bone-implant unit].
Schandelmaier P; Krettek C; Tscherne H
Unfallchirurg; 1994 Nov; 97(11):600-8. PubMed ID: 7817197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
