113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17457810)
1. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality?
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 17457810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging.
Achiam MP; Løgager VB; Chabanova E; Eegholm B; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2009 Jul; 34(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 18452023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12066239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.
Boraschi P; Donati F
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):585-94. PubMed ID: 27209295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population.
Kinner S; Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Nuefer M; Zoepf T; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2286-93. PubMed ID: 17522866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance colonography with fecal tagging: an innovative approach without bowel cleansing.
Lauenstein TC; Debatin JF
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 13(6):435-44. PubMed ID: 12478023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms.
Rodriguez Gomez S; Pagés Llinas M; Castells Garangou A; De Juan Garcia C; Bordas Alsina JM; Rimola Gibert J; Ayuso Colella JR; Ayuso Colella C
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18320195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance.
Lauenstein T; Holtmann G; Schoenfelder D; Bosk S; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 11566681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of using automated insufflated carbon dioxide (CO2) for luminal distension in 3.0T MR colonography.
Zijta FM; Nederveen AJ; Jensch S; Florie J; Bipat S; van der Paardt MP; van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1128-33. PubMed ID: 21440398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences.
Papanikolaou N; Grammatikakis J; Maris T; Lauenstein T; Prassopoulos P; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 12594545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Holtmann G; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 11930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 17019654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.
Kuehle CA; Langhorst J; Ladd SC; Zoepf T; Nuefer M; Grabellus F; Barkhausen J; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
Gut; 2007 Aug; 56(8):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17341542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
