These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An EHR user-satisfaction survey: advice from 408 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2005 Oct; 12(9):29-35. PubMed ID: 16296595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. DesRoches CM; Campbell EG; Rao SR; Donelan K; Ferris TG; Jha A; Kaushal R; Levy DE; Rosenbaum S; Shields AE; Blumenthal D N Engl J Med; 2008 Jul; 359(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 18565855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EHR? Count me out. Davant C Med Econ; 2005 Jul; 82(14):72. PubMed ID: 16173669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 2011 EHR User Satisfaction Survey: responses from 2,719 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2011; 18(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 21842823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. To what extent are practices 'paperless' and what are the constraints to them becoming more so? Waring N Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jan; 50(450):46-7. PubMed ID: 10695068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician use of IT: results from the Deloitte Research Survey. Miller RH; Hillman JM; Given RS J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 14971083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating changes in end-user satisfaction with installation of an electronic medical record in ambulatory care settings. Gamm LD; Barsukiewicz CK; Dansky KH; Vasey JJ J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10345834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Electronic medical records: the FPM vendor survey. Rehm S; Kraft S Fam Pract Manag; 2001 Jan; 8(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 11317858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A physician's perspective: deploying the EMR. Smith D; Newell LM J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 11941926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Purchasing an affordable electronic health record. Spikol L Fam Pract Manag; 2005 Feb; 12(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 15779280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types. Miller RH; Sim I; Newman J Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. PubMed ID: 15360895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. User satisfaction with EHRs: report of a survey of 422 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2008 Feb; 15(2):25-32. PubMed ID: 18303652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Simon SR; Kaushal R; Cleary PD; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Orav EJ; Burdick E; Poon EG; Bates DW Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17353500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Pizziferri L; Kittler AF; Volk LA; Honour MM; Gupta S; Wang S; Wang T; Lippincott M; Li Q; Bates DW J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88. PubMed ID: 15896691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When usage and user satisfaction differ: the case of an electronic discharge summary. Bürkle T; Engel PA Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1093-7. PubMed ID: 17911884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EHR Switch Survey: Responses From 305 Family Physicians. Adler KG; Edsall RL Fam Pract Manag; 2015; 22(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25591227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. EHR adoption 'pitifully behind'. Study: only 10% of physicians use IT to its fullest. DoBias M Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(41):8-9. PubMed ID: 17086952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]