These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17458385)
1. The Supreme Court's Burlington Decision: implications for the health care workplace. Spevak C Physician Exec; 2007; 33(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 17458385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Employers' obligation to provide reasonable accommodation. Vierling LE Case Manager; 2002; 13(6):24-6. PubMed ID: 12439458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court, "Our Town," and disability policy: boardrooms and bedrooms, courtrooms and cloakrooms. Stowe MJ; Turnbull HR; Sublet C Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 16689619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New workplace challenges. One year after September 11. Klein MH Caring; 2002 Sep; 21(9):14-7. PubMed ID: 12244803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyst offers tips on how to defeat punitive damage claims. AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Jul; 14(13):12. PubMed ID: 11366589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court's Crisis Pregnancy Center Case - Implications for Health Law. Parmet WE; Berman ML; Smith JA N Engl J Med; 2018 Oct; 379(16):1489-1491. PubMed ID: 30156965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability for age discrimination in the health care workplace. Stickler KB; Nelson MD J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):185-90. PubMed ID: 10288420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disability discrimination in the 1990s: an overview of the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Schurgin WP; Rowland DJ J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Sep; 24(9):274-81. PubMed ID: 10170797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Affirmative action after the Supreme Court's 1988-1989 term: what employers need to know. Thacker RA Employ Relat Today; 1990; 17(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10105600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Euthanasia and the Supreme Court's competing conceptions of religious liberty. Stacy T Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 8077103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A court case that could galvanize a field. Raytheon v. Hernandez. de Miranda J Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 2003 Dec; 12(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 14696290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. State law, public policy and discrimination. Sfikas PM J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Nov; 133(11):1565-7. PubMed ID: 12462702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott. Parmet WE J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions. Coelho T Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Labor law for the nonunion agency. Gilliland JC Caring; 1997 Mar; 16(3):14-8, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10166262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EEO alert: watch out for discrimination in discharge decisions. Klotchman J; Neider LL Personnel; 1983; 60(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 10260375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]