170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17458882)
1. Optimized amplification and fluorescent labeling of small cell samples for genomic array-CGH.
Knijnenburg J; van der Burg M; Tanke HJ; Szuhai K
Cytometry A; 2007 Aug; 71(8):585-91. PubMed ID: 17458882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large fragment Bst DNA polymerase for whole genome amplification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
Aviel-Ronen S; Qi Zhu C; Coe BP; Liu N; Watson SK; Lam WL; Tsao MS
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():312. PubMed ID: 17156491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for further quantitative analysis with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Lee YS; Tsai CN; Tsai CL; Chang SD; Hsueh DW; Liu CT; Ma CC; Lin SH; Wang TH; Wang HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 47(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 18400580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplifying small amounts of tumor DNA allows detection of DNA copy number abberations with array-CGH.
Prestegarden L; Misra A; Ware ML; Yeh RF; Bjerkvig R; Feuerstein BG
Biotechniques; 2008 Jun; 44(7):Piii-Pvi. PubMed ID: 18533897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a whole-genome amplification method based on adaptor-ligation PCR of randomly sheared genomic DNA.
Tanabe C; Aoyagi K; Sakiyama T; Kohno T; Yanagitani N; Akimoto S; Sakamoto M; Sakamoto H; Yokota J; Ohki M; Terada M; Yoshida T; Sasaki H
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Oct; 38(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 12939744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An isothermal primer extension method for whole genome amplification of fresh and degraded DNA: applications in comparative genomic hybridization, genotyping and mutation screening.
Lee CI; Leong SH; Png AE; Choo KW; Syn C; Lim DT; Law HY; Kon OL
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(5):2185-94. PubMed ID: 17406456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method for manufacturing whole-genome microarrays by rolling circle amplification.
Smirnov DA; Burdick JT; Morley M; Cheung VG
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2004 May; 40(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 15034872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limited tissue fixation times and whole genomic amplification do not impact array CGH profiles.
Ghazani AA; Arneson NC; Warren K; Done SJ
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 16505285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple displacement amplification to create a long-lasting source of DNA for genetic studies.
Lovmar L; Syvänen AC
Hum Mutat; 2006 Jul; 27(7):603-14. PubMed ID: 16786504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.
Tan NH; Palmer R; Wang R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 20178523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An isothermal method for whole genome amplification of fresh and degraded DNA for comparative genomic hybridization, genotyping and mutation detection.
Lee CI; Leong SH; Png AE; Choo KW; Syn C; Lim DT; Law HY; Kon OL
DNA Res; 2006 Apr; 13(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 16766515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a DNA-labeling system for array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Lieu PT; Jozsi P; Gilles P; Peterson T
J Biomol Tech; 2005 Jun; 16(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 16030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA quantification of whole genome amplified samples for genotyping on a multiplexed bead array platform.
Hansen HM; Wiemels JL; Wrensch M; Wiencke JK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1686-90. PubMed ID: 17684147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting single DNA copy number variations in complex genomes using one nanogram of starting DNA and BAC-array CGH.
Guillaud-Bataille M; Valent A; Soularue P; Perot C; Inda MM; Receveur A; Smaïli S; Roest Crollius H; Bénard J; Bernheim A; Gidrol X; Danglot G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Jul; 32(13):e112. PubMed ID: 15284333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
