These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17459447)

  • 1. Filtering items of mass distraction: top-down biases against distractors are necessary for the feature-based carry-over to occur.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1570-83. PubMed ID: 17459447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.
    Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(11):1464-78. PubMed ID: 17433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: evidence from negative color carry-over effects.
    Dent K; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 21484507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast color grouping and slow color inhibition: evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 17563218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):758-78. PubMed ID: 12967220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faster target selection in preview visual search depends on luminance onsets: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Kiss M; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1637-42. PubMed ID: 21717288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 15912874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 12661682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The costs of switching attentional sets.
    Dombrowe I; Donk M; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2481-8. PubMed ID: 21879418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of colour on preview search: anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):389-415. PubMed ID: 15559111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
    Hodsoll J; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 11521856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.