These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17460006)

  • 1. Automated ultrasound scanning on a dual-modality breast imaging system: coverage and motion issues and solutions.
    Sinha SP; Goodsitt MM; Roubidoux MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Lashbrook CR; Thomenius KE; Chalek CL; Carson PL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 May; 26(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 17460006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing motion artifacts in 3-D breast ultrasound using non-linear registration.
    Boehler T; Peitgen HO
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):998-1005. PubMed ID: 18982702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound.
    Sinha SP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Nees AV; Goodsitt MM; LeCarpentier GL; Fowlkes JB; Chalek CL; Carson PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1335-8. PubMed ID: 18002210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a gel retainment dam on automated ultrasound coverage in a dual-modality breast imaging system.
    Li J; Goodsitt MM; Padilla F; Fowlkes JB; Hooi FM; Lashbrook CR; Thomenius KE; Carson PL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20587431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
    Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.
    Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-modal registration based ultrasound mosaicing.
    Kutter O; Wein W; Navab N
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):763-70. PubMed ID: 20426057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First clinical use of a standardized three-dimensional ultrasound for breast imaging.
    Kotsianos-Hermle D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky KM; Reiser M
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 18479867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fusion of vibro-acoustography images and X-ray mammography.
    GholamHosseini H; Alizad A; Fatemi M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2803-6. PubMed ID: 17946531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mono- and multimodal registration of optical breast images.
    Pearlman PC; Adams A; Elias SG; Mali WP; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Aug; 17(8):080901-1. PubMed ID: 23224161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement selection in untracked freehand 3D ultrasound.
    Laporte C; Arbel T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 1):127-34. PubMed ID: 20879223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
    Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration.
    Hopp T; Duric N; Ruiter NV
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():170-81. PubMed ID: 25456144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
    Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Navigator echo motion artifact suppression in synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging.
    Kadah YM; El-Sharkawy Ael-M; Youssef AB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 15651573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound image segmentation and tissue characterization.
    Noble JA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 20349821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
    Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.