452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17461903)
1. Ductal pattern enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage.
Ghanouni P; Kurian AW; Margolis D; Hartman AR; Mills MA; Plevritis SK; Ford JM; Daniel BL
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17461903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [In situ ductal carcinoma of the breast: a diagnostic challenge].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):69-73. PubMed ID: 12621847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI.
Nakahara H; Namba K; Wakamatsu H; Watanabe R; Furusawa H; Shirouzu M; Matsu T; Tanaka C; Akiyama F; Ifuku H; Nakahara M; Tamura S
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12002599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI and post-processing technique for diagnosis of breast cancer].
Peng KQ; Huang ZL; Xie CM; Chen L; Ouyang Y; Zheng QS; Zhang Y; He HQ; Wu PH
Ai Zheng; 2009 May; 28(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 19624888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic Resonance Female Breast Imaging (MRFBI) - Evaluation of the Changes in Signal Intensity over Time Pre- and Post-administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA.
Schedel H; Oellinger H; Kohlschein P; Siewert C; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Kissner T; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Feb; 124(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 11935495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Daniel BL
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):345-56, vii. PubMed ID: 11493424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
Day D
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for breast disease diagnosis].
Wang Q; Hu GD; Kuang J; Li JM
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 29(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 19246303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging identifies multifocal and multicentric disease in breast cancer patients who are eligible for partial breast irradiation.
Al-Hallaq HA; Mell LK; Bradley JA; Chen LF; Ali AN; Weichselbaum RR; Newstead GM; Chmura SJ
Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(9):2408-14. PubMed ID: 18823018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance mammography--open questions].
Kessler M; Sittek H; Reiser M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M107-15. PubMed ID: 8974887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
