These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17462838)
21. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection. Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Moore NP; Andrew DJ; Bjerke DL; Creton S; Dreher D; Holmes T; Prieto P; Seidle T; Rowan TG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23461858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis. Zhu H; Tropsha A; Fourches D; Varnek A; Papa E; Gramatica P; Oberg T; Dao P; Cherkasov A; Tetko IV J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 18311912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH). Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio. Zvinavashe E; Du T; Griff T; van den Berg HH; Soffers AE; Vervoort J; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1531-8. PubMed ID: 19376559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data. Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of mammalian and fish cell line cytotoxicity: impact of endpoint and exposure duration. Gülden M; Mörchel S; Seibert H Aquat Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 71(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 15670629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals. Winder C; Azzi R; Wagner D J Hazard Mater; 2005 Oct; 125(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 16039045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Buschmann J Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statistical evaluation of chronic toxicity data on aquatic organisms for the hazard identification: the chemicals toxicity distribution approach. González-Doncel M; Ortiz J; Izquierdo JJ; Martín B; Sánchez P; Tarazona JV Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):835-44. PubMed ID: 16169042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ECOSAR model performance with a large test set of industrial chemicals. Reuschenbach P; Silvani M; Dammann M; Warnecke D; Knacker T Chemosphere; 2008 May; 71(10):1986-95. PubMed ID: 18262586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. Jeram S; Sintes JM; Halder M; Fentanes JB; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Hutchinson TH Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 15949882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. van Leeuwen K; Schultz TW; Henry T; Diderich B; Veith GD SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(3-4):207-20. PubMed ID: 19544189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology. Veith GD SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):323-30. PubMed ID: 15669692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate. Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reduction of the numbers of animals used for the classification of the acute oral toxicity of chemicals by taking into account cytotoxicity data from the Registry of Cytotoxicity. Halle W; Liebsch M; Traue D; Spielmann H ALTEX; 1997; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11178482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Prediction of LD50 values by cell culture]. Halle W; Göres E Pharmazie; 1987 Apr; 42(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 3615556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chronic oral LOAEL prediction by using a commercially available computational QSAR tool. Rupp B; Appel KE; Gundert-Remy U Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 20224925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. Aptula AO; Roberts DW Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 19(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16918251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]