161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17463131)
1. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.
Davis ET; Gallie P; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 17463131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.
Bailey C; Gul R; Falworth M; Zadow S; Oakeshott R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 18972176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study].
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Wirtz D; Mumme T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 18561082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of conventional guidewire alignment jigs with imageless computer navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Chiu M; Gamble P; Boyle RA; Tumia N; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 20686057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imageless computer navigation without pre-operative templating may lead to malpreparation of the femoral head in hip resurfacing.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Chiu M; Gamble P; Tumia N; Boyle RA; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19794160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a patient specific femoral alignment guide for hip resurfacing.
Olsen M; Naudie DD; Edwards MR; Sellan ME; McCalden RW; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 24034907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Christian Wirtz D; Mumme T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Aug; 53(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 18643714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19258604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty.
Cobb JP; Kannan V; Brust K; Thevendran G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():90-7. PubMed ID: 17603387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty - a single-surgeon experience.
Shields JS; Seyler TM; Maguire C; Jinnah RH
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 19583547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve.
Romanowski JR; Swank ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():65-70. PubMed ID: 18676939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How accurate is image-free computer navigation for hip resurfacing arthroplasty? An anatomical investigation.
Schnurr C; Nessler J; Meyer C; Schild HH; Koebke J; König DP
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 19802660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study.
Audenaert E; De Smedt K; Gelaude F; Clijmans T; Pattyn C; Geebelen B
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 21916560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.
Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing.
Hodgson AJ; Inkpen KB; Shekhman M; Anglin C; Tonetti J; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV
Comput Aided Surg; 2005; 10(5-6):337-43. PubMed ID: 16410236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.
Su EP; Sheehan M; Su SL
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 19056234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Resubal JR; Morgan DA
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 18534413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.
Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K; Mumme T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20476504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
