These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1031 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17463230)

  • 41. The interference of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impaired subjects.
    Larsby B; Hällgren M; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S83-90. PubMed ID: 19012115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of auditory input in individuation tasks.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):869-81. PubMed ID: 19046156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test.
    Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Houtgast T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 19778398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task.
    Peiffer AM; Mozolic JL; Hugenschmidt CE; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17558300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Audio-visual interactions with intact clearly audible speech.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1103-21. PubMed ID: 15370518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities.
    Besser J; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Festen JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The use of visual stimuli during auditory assessment.
    Pearlman RC; Cunningham DR; Williamson DG; Amerman JD
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 1232077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Relations among linguistic and cognitive skills and spoken word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Collison EA; Munson B; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 47(3):496-508. PubMed ID: 15212564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of presentation modality and valence on affect recognition performance in schizophrenia and healthy controls.
    Fiszdon JM; Bell MD
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Dec; 170(2-3):114-8. PubMed ID: 19900721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.