BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1746365)

  • 1. [Visual evoked potential and relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with unilateral optic neuritis].
    Nagashima Y; Kato M; Watanabe I
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Oct; 95(10):1004-8. PubMed ID: 1746365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optic neuritis in children--clinical and electrophysiological follow-up.
    Tekavcic-Pompe M; Stirn-Kranjc B; Brecelj J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Nov; 107(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 14711158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual evoked potential and pupillary signs. A comparison in optic nerve disease.
    Cox TA; Thompson HS; Hayreh SS; Snyder JE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1982 Oct; 100(10):1603-7. PubMed ID: 7138329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective assessment of a relative afferent pupillary defect by B-mode ultrasound.
    Schmidt FA; Connolly F; Maas MB; Grittner U; Harms L; Brandt A; Paul F; Schreiber S; Ruprecht K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202774. PubMed ID: 30148895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Relationship between central visual field and pattern VECP in optic neuritis].
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 93(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 2816574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study.
    Hood DC; Odel JG; Zhang X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):4032-8. PubMed ID: 11053309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis.
    Chatziralli IP; Moschos MM; Brouzas D; Kopsidas K; Ladas ID
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Mar; 95(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 22329676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Treatment of acute optic neuritis with high dose of prednisone].
    Liu Q; Zhang M; Ai F; Jiang R; Hu T
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1998 Jun; 20(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 11367712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of retinal nerve fibre layer, visual evoked potentials and relative afferent pupillary defect in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Chilińska A; Ejma M; Turno-Kręcicka A; Guranski K; Misiuk-Hojlo M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):821-826. PubMed ID: 26251105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pattern reversal VEP and computer perimetry of the partner eye in optic neuritis].
    Lowitzsch K; Welkoborsky HJ
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1987 Dec; 18(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 3123195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Managing unexplained visual loss--a "quick guide"].
    Wilhelm H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Nov; 229(11):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22996632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis.
    Johnson LN; Yee RD; Hepler RS; Martin DA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1987; 225(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 3582995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Long-term prolongation of direct pupillary light reflex latency and P100 latency of pattern visual evoked potential in unilateral optic neuritis].
    Chin S; Suzuki Y; Ohashi T; Kase M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Feb; 99(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 7701996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis.
    Samsen P; Chuenkongkaew WL; Masayaanon P; Chirapapaisan N; Ruangvaravate N; Loket S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 17375637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associating the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) with visual field indices in glaucoma patients.
    Schiefer U; Dietzsch J; Dietz K; Wilhelm B; Bruckmann A; Wilhelm H; Kitiratschky V; Januschowski K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 22328816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with asymmetric cataracts.
    Hwang JM; Kim C; Kim JY
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jan; 30(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 14967280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative afferent pupillary defects in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy and unilateral visual loss.
    Jacobson DM; Stone EM; Miller NR; Pollock SC; Fletcher WA; McNussen PJ; Martin TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Aug; 126(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 9727524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) in multiple sclerosis.
    Stefano E; Cupini LM; Rizzo P; Pierelli F; Rizzo PA
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1991; 91(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 2028736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of visual evoked potentials in the differential diagnosis of functional visual loss and optic neuritis in children.
    Suppiej A; Gaspa G; Cappellari A; Toldo I; Battistella PA
    J Child Neurol; 2011 Jan; 26(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 20587737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.