262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17464818)
1. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The need to incorporate routine cervical cancer counselling and screening in the management of women at the outpatient clinics in Nigeria.
Dim CC; Nwagha UI; Ezegwui HU; Dim NR
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Nov; 29(8):754-6. PubMed ID: 19821672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina.
Arrossi S; Ramos S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):50-8. PubMed ID: 19027622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer risk factors and predictors of cervical dysplasia among women in south-west Nigeria.
Ogunbowale T; Lawoyin TO
Aust J Rural Health; 2008 Dec; 16(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 19032205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Participation in cervical cancer screening by age and region--a cohort study with a 3 1/2 year follow-up on 2,223,135 women in Bavaria.
Rückinger S; Tauscher M; Redel R; Munte A; Walchner-Bonjean M; Hess J; Schneider A; von Kries R
Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e17-21. PubMed ID: 18661453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mobilization for cervical cancer screening: lessons from a poor-urban Yoruba community in Nigeria.
Thomas JO; Babarinsa IA; Ajayi IO; Fawole O; Ojemakinde KO; Omigbodun AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Mar; 34(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15973782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer awareness and cervical screening uptake at the Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Afikpo, Southeast Nigeria.
Eze JN; Umeora OU; Obuna JA; Egwuatu VE; Ejikeme BN
Ann Afr Med; 2012; 11(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23103924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing Taiwan's high incidence of cervical cancer: factors associated with the Nation's low compliance with Papanicolaou screening in Taiwan.
Liao CC; Wang HY; Lin RS; Hsieh CY; Sung FC
Public Health; 2006 Dec; 120(12):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17074376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008.
Armour BS; Thierry JM; Wolf LA
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge attitudes and practices of cervical cancer screening among urban and rural Nigerian women: a call for education and mass screening.
Nwankwo KC; Aniebue UU; Aguwa EN; Anarado AN; Agunwah E
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 May; 20(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 20345451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe.
Mangoma JF; Chirenje MZ; Chimbari MJ; Chandiwana SK
Afr J Reprod Health; 2006 Apr; 10(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16999199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Socioeconomic status and cancer screening.
Segnan N
IARC Sci Publ; 1997; (138):369-76. PubMed ID: 9353678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's participation in a cervical cancer screening program in northern Peru.
Winkler J; Bingham A; Coffey P; Handwerker WP
Health Educ Res; 2008 Feb; 23(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 17229778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
